Lab 5: Nashville 2020 Tornado Outbreak
Lab 5: Severe Weather Signatures on Doppler Radar in Nashville 2020
By: Brittany Kehrer
Figure 1: The picture was taken in Nashville, TN on March 3, 2020, after several violent EF3 and EF4 tornadoes passed through. The image was taken from Wikipedia. |
On March 2-3, 2020, several supercell thunderstorms made their way across southeast Missouri, southern Kentucky, Tenessee, and central Alabama. These thunderstorms brought - in some regions - baseball size hail and damaging EF3 to EF4 tornadoes. For the purposes of this blog, I will be focusing on the tornado outbreaks that occurred near Nashville, TN in the early morning hours of March 3, 2020. These damaging tornadoes seen in this region caused several injuries and 25 fatalities. The first tornado was categorized as an EF3 and stretched up to 60 miles - I will refer to this tornado as 'Tornado 1' during this blog. The second tornado was categorized as an EF0, and was short-lived - I will refer to this tornado as 'Tornado 2' during this blog. Before we take a look at the radar data associated with these Tornadoes 1 and 2, I want to dive deeper into the background associated with each Tornado. I also want to note that there was a severe EF4 tornado that occurred after Tornado 2, but the length of my data only covers Tornadoes 1 and 2.
Tornado 1 touched down east of Nashville, TN at 12:32 AM CST (0632 Z) and was last seen at 01:35 AM CST (0735 Z). This EF3 tornado stretched a total of 60.13 miles and had a maximum speed of 165 mph. Tornado 1 caused over 200 injuries and 5 deaths. Over $90 million worth of damage was reported from Tornado 1 alone. Tornado 2 touched down north of Nashville, TN at 1:38 AM CST (0738 Z) and was last observed at 1:42 AM CST (0742 Z). This EF0 tornado stretched 3.32 miles and had a maximum speed of 75 mph. For most of the figures provided - and for most of this blog discussion - I will be focusing on Tornado 1, however at the very end of every GIF provided, you can catch a slight glimpse of Tornado 2, so it is worth noting.
I first want to start with a zoomed-out radar reflectivity loop of Nashville, TN on March 3, 2020, from 0630Z to 0730 Z - Figure 2. This GIF alone can allow us to see some interesting radar signatures. It can first be clearly seen that this severe thunderstorm system is made up of several multi-cell thunderstorms. With these multi-cell thunderstorms, we can see several radar reflectivity cores - or several regions of high reflectivity within the bands. Because these multi-cell thunderstorms are very strongly broken up, it looks as though several multi-call lines are also present. This is most clearly seen northwest of the radar. Once we zoom into a more localized region, we will see some more radar signatures.
Now, let's zoom in and focus on Tornado 1. From a first glance (or from the first few glances) it might not be clear where Tornado 1 is occurring in Figure 4 (radar reflectivity at 0.5 degrees) and Figure 5 (radar reflectivity at 1.3 degrees). This is where Figures 6 and 7 come into play. In Figure 6, I have indicated where Tornado 1 is first seen on the radar screenshot. In Figure 7, I have indicated where Tornado 1 occurs at a later time in its path on the radar screenshot. Figure 6 was taken at 0636 AM - 6 minutes after this EF3 tornado touched down. Figure 7 was taken at 0708Z, approximately 20 minutes before the disappearance of Tornado 1 (and at a radar reflectivity height of 1.3 degrees).
Now that the tornado was pointed out in Figures 6 and 7, it can be more easily followed in Figures 4 and 5. Because Figure 4 was taken at the base height of 0.5 degrees, there is a ton of ground clutter that is noticed in the loop. In Figure 4, there is also a hail spike that occurs very briefly following the tornado, another indication that hail occurred. However, because of the ground clutter, the hail spike is very faint. Figure 7 was taken at a height of 1.3 degrees, so any ground clutter has mostly disappeared and the tornado features are much more easily noticed. It is also amazing to see the vertical depth of the tornado between Figure 4 at 0.5 degrees and Figure 5 at 1.3 degrees.
Let's look at some radar signatures associated with Figure 6. The first, and probably most noticeable, is the hook echo that is starting to form (indicated by the right white arrow). As the storm progresses, this hook echo gets deeper. This hook echo, with a bright center of reflectivity, indicates a region of a debris ball forming or a debris ball that has already started to form. The next radar signature that I notice is a v-notch to the left of the hook echo (indicated by the left white arrow). This v-notch is indicative of a very strong updraft, and I find it interesting how it is following the hook echo (to the left of the hook echo).
The radar signatures seen in Figure 6 and also seen in Figure 7. I want to note that I decided to use Figure 7 at a radar reflectivity at 1.3 degrees because the radar signatures are more clearly seen at this scan height (similar to Figure 5). I also want to state again that Figure 7 is taken at a later time stamp and is now many miles away from the origin, and has grown in strength. Similar to Figure 6, there is a noticeable hook echo in Figure 7 (indicated by the white arrow). The maximum in reflectivity in the hook echo represents a debris ball formed by the tornado.
I wanted to include the following two Figures to show the radial velocity of this severe weather event. Figure 8 is an animated GIF of Tornado 1 in the same region shown in Figure 7 - to the right of the radar. As the GIF progresses, you can see a light blue velocity ball make its way across the screen. This makes me believe that the blue velocity ball is infact associated with the Tornado 1.
Figure 9 is a matching screenshot of Figure 7 showing the radial velocity. As you can see, the blue ball in Figure 9, matches the location of the hook arrow in Figure 7. I find it interesting how these radial velocity images show the blue velocity ball as an almost perfect sphere shape instead of a common Tornado Vortex Signature. My theory is from the strength of the winds (165 mph).
I also want to note that at the end of Figure 8 - where the blue velocity ball seems to die down - is where Tornado 2 picked up shortly after.
Overall with this tornadic event, you had to zoom far into the radar in order to see the event occurring. Because this severe thunderstorm was a multi cellur event, there are a lot of different sections of the thunderstorm to consider for tornados. In fact, while some tornadoes were occurring in Tennesee, tornadoes were also occurring in Kentucky.
Some questions I am left with is concerning the ground clutter seen in Figure 4. There are many areas where the radar is picking up a "splatter" like pattern but does not seem to connect or correlate to the severe weather system. It makes me wonder what the radar was picking up. Some of this "splatter" pattern is seen in figure 5, but is significantly less frequent. Could this be debris from high winds not associated with the tornado? It makes me think about what a radar scan of BNA looks like on a clear day. What ground clutter will be seen on that radar scan?
The links below provides immense amounts of information of the tornado outbreak that occurred on March 3, 2020, if you want to find out more.
https://www.weather.gov/ohx/20200303
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/archive/event.php?date=20200302
Hey Brittany,
ReplyDeleteAwesome job analyzing this storm system, it's crazy how many tornados can spawn off of one severe thunderstorm with just the right conditions. I really loved the RHI cross section that you presented that showed the movement of the storm through the area of the radar and out the other side. I had never seen that before, I had only seen the RHI used to determine the depth and height of a storm one way. Being able to see the storm evolution and progression from a cross section really emphasizes the height of the storm intensity as well as how the more intense areas interact with the rest of the storm. Your question about what could be causing all of the noise around the storm that is not storm related is a tough one. Debris from the storm could be a good guess or else maybe some sort of folding? But the signatures don't really look uniform or condensed enough for folding.
Hi Brittany,
ReplyDeleteThis was a really excellent write up, as Rachel said the RHI cross section loop was a very cool visualization. I would suspect that much of the noise around the storm is ground clutter of some sort, as it appears to be occurring in a circular pattern around the radar source. That said, it does seem much more cluttered than usual so I wouldn't be surprised if something unusual is contributing to it.